Team Alignment Scan

Your team can sit in the same meeting, and leave with different realities.

Reveal where leaders and teams interpret decisions, ownership, priorities and execution differently, before those gaps become delays, rework or conflict.

S$490 per team · Up to 10 participants · About 7–9 minutes each

Why divergence matters

The average can hide the problem.

Average 66, gap 36

Illustrative
Leadership84
Team48
Perception gap36

A moderate-looking average can conceal two groups experiencing the same organisation very differently. Yurify looks at the divergence, not just the average.

Agreement is not always healthy.

Illustrative
Leadership: ownership clarity38
Team: ownership clarity40
Perception gap2

The team is aligned, around an unhealthy pattern. Align separately examines perception alignment and execution quality.

Illustrative only, not client data.

Coverage

Five execution dimensions

01

Decision Clarity

Do people understand what was actually decided?

02

Ownership Clarity

Is responsibility for the next action and outcome explicit?

03

Alignment & Priorities

Are people operating from the same assumptions and priorities?

04

Challenge & Information Flow

Can disagreement, risk and relevant information reach decision-makers before decisions become fixed?

05

Execution & Follow-Through

Do decisions translate into action without repeated clarification, escalation or rework?

Within these dimensions, Yurify detects recurring friction patterns such as:

Decision ReopeningOwnership AmbiguityRepeated ClarificationFalse AgreementLeader BottleneckDefensive FeedbackMeeting TheatreCross-functional Friction

Participants answer a common core set of behavioural questions, with a small number of contextual questions based on role. This allows Yurify to meaningfully compare how different people experience the same team.

The majority of questions are consistent across participants so differences in perception can be compared directly.

Two ways to use it

General or focused

General Team Scan

Assess how a team generally operates.

Specific Execution Challenge

Assess alignment around a specific launch, project, organisational change or cross-functional issue.

"How aligned are Product and Commercial around Project Atlas?"

Process

How the scan runs

1

The sponsor sets up the scan

Choose a general team scan or focus it on a specific execution challenge.

2

Participants respond individually

Up to 10 people each spend about 7–9 minutes on a common core of behavioural questions.

3

Responses are analysed in aggregate

Yurify compares how different people experience the same decisions, ownership and execution.

4

You receive the team report

Shared patterns, perception gaps and areas of healthy alignment.

5

You decide what happens next

Use the findings internally, add an Expert Readout, or discuss a Sprint.

Privacy

Individual responses remain confidential.

Leaders receive aggregated team patterns, not individual answers.

Group-level reporting. Findings are reported for the team, not for individuals.

Minimum subgroup sizes. Role-based comparisons are only shown where at least five people are represented.

Suppression. Where a result could identify an individual, it is merged into a larger group or withheld.

Research use. Anonymised aggregate data may be used to develop future research and reference ranges, never individual responses.

Read how Yurify handles data →

Have team data?

Expert Readout

Human interpretation of your scan: leadership intake, expert analysis, a 75-minute leadership readout, prioritisation and a written action memo. It answers what may be causing these patterns, and what leadership should address first.

Add Expert Interpretation

Does your team share the same reality?

S$490 per team · Up to 10 participants · About 7–9 minutes each